Bluehost vs WP Engine Comparison, In this article, be a part of me as I take a deep dive into comparing Bluehost, 2 of the biggest names in the hosting world. Here you’ll notice all the information you’d like regarding your evaluation options, ease of use, performance, security, and customer support.
WP Engine is one of the top stylish managed WordPress hosting providers. The provider focuses entirely on WordPress hosting. Their target market seems to be numerous larger-scale companies and sites. It will just look like a worry-free, premium hosting option.
Bluehost, on the other hand, is one of the most popular shared hosting services on the market. Its ease of use and reasonable performance measure what appeals to beginners looking for an easy and inexpensive start. It’s also very WordPress-oriented, just not as unique as WP Engine.
As you may have noticed by now, WP Engine and Bluehost have slightly different approaches. However, that draws scrutiny between the two, and even draws a lot of attention. therefore, let’s take a look at their summaries first.
Although both WP Engine and Bluehost measure hosting providers that are focused on users who need WordPress hosting, the two can’t be too different. WP Engine could be a managed hosting provider, while Bluehost is better known for its extremely WordPress-oriented shared hosting services. WP Engine has much better performance metrics and is much more advanced, while Bluehost could be much friendlier to your wallet.
|💲 Pricing:||From $2.95/month||From $22.50/month|
|⚙️ Ease of use:||Modern native dashboard with classic cPanel integration||A native hosting management panel|
|🏁 Performance:||99.99% time step and 361 ms time step||100% time period, 489 ms interval|
|🛡️ Security:||SSL and social server control||Free SSL, Daily Backups, Server Enforcement|
|👨💻 Support:||Phone and live chat 24/7||Live chat, ticket, and phone 24/7|
When it comes to evaluation alone, WP Engine is much more expensive than Bluehost. WP Engine offers four plans + one custom, ranging from $22.50/month to $217.50/month. Bluehost’s most profitable rate is $2.95/month, and the most expensive rate is $13.95/month. Additionally, Bluehost has managed WordPress plans starting at $9.95/month, however, the only advantage is that it makes quantification a bit easier.
Sure, the costs measure cardinally different between the two. But what matters is what you get for that value purpose. For a better understanding, let’s compare the plans of the most profitable providers.
For starters, there are a number of similarities between the 2. WP Engine and Bluehost include a free SSL certificate and CDN in their entry plans, as well as allowing you to host a website. Yet, here is where the comparisons end.
|WP Engine||Startup ($22.50/month)||No||Yes||10GB||50GB|
Just looking at the entry plans, we can see that Bluehost offers larger storage, free domain, and unlimited data measure.
While WP Engine won’t have that factor, it hosts your websites on Google Cloud servers and offers staging, daily backups, and custom caching.
So, really, the alternatives screw you over. If you are looking for a cheap fix for a small website, Bluehost is the best option. If you’re trying to find a business-oriented approach, WP Engine’s daily backups and additional tools like custom staging or caching may sway you.
|Provider||Plan||Billing period||Total initial price||Total renewal price|
|WP Engine||Startup||1 year||$270||$300|
Overall, Bluehost is less expensive than WP Engine. WP Engine is largely considered a premium selection in any case. However, both providers offer pretty reasonable deals for the price you pay.
Now that we know what the most profitable WP Engine and Bluehost plans should provide, are they the best overall? Or is there a concept with a much better one? When digging further, this is often what I’ve discovered.
WP Engine has four managed-to-host plans from $22.50/month to $217.50/month with an application amount of 1 year.
However, not all plans have the same price. That is why I advise you to consider:
- Startup ($22.50/month) if you are trying to find a solid website for your ripening business. value purpose is extremely cheap for the included resources.
- Scale ($217/month) if you are providing website creation, design, or management services to your buyers. If you were hosting all thirty websites, each site would cost $7.25/month.
Surely, your personal needs measure what drives the selection, so knowing all you have to do is choose what best suits your needs.
The cheapest option with WP Engine is for the Startup to organize with an application amount of 1 year. Settlement is $22.50/mo which totals $270 for a down payment. when renewing, the value goes up to $300 for the following year.
Bluehost also has four plans to settle on. Costs here range from $2.95/month to $13.95/month with a 3-year application arrangement.
Unlike WP Engine, Bluehost recommends the most effective fix, i.e. select and. However, I personally assume and offer a much higher price in terms of resources offered for the value you pay.
- Plus ($4.95/month) offers unlimited websites and SSD storage compared to Basic.
Now speaking of selection and pro plans, each one offers some useful options like domain privacy and automatic backups. However, if you don’t have a specific desire for these options, these plans are too expensive. and therefore the renewal fees build the value ship even.
The most noteworthy Bluehost arrangement is and. By selecting an application amount of 36 months, you can get very low monthly rates. This makes the deal $4.95/month or $178.20 total. Renewal fees bring the total to $431.64.
If by the time you read my article you have already decided, simply because of the price difference, I don’t blame you.
Keep in mind, however, that WP Engine is a managed hosting provider, which means you won’t have to worry about automatic updates, managed updates, daily backups, or continuous website monitoring. The host takes care of that for you.
Plus, WP Engine offers a generous 60-day money-back guarantee, which means you have plenty of time to check it out. On the other hand, Bluehost has the standard 30-day money-back guarantee.
As the Bluehost vs WP Engine evaluation comparison goes, Bluehost offers lower costs. However, if we tend to remember that Bluehost offers shared hosting and WP Engine offers managed hosting services, WP Engine costs are not very high either.
Hosting management: Ease of use
Simplicity is the name of the sport once it involves user interfaces and admin panels. And let the US state tell you that the WP Engine vs Bluehost match is extremely head-to-head here. Each vendor made sure its user interface and admin panels were intuitive and easy to use.
Account management dashboard
WP Engine comes with a completely custom dashboard. And while WP Engine’s administration is much more advanced than standard shared hosting, its control panel is virtually effortless to use effectively.
Much of the essential data is in the main panel.
All focus on the left, the menu has all the necessary tools and options to manage your sites, such as applications, tools, and sites. On the right, you’ll see your site statistics, which can help you manage your storage and track the number of tourists.
Bluehost also has its own custom user panel. This dashboard works as a hosting and website admin panel. From here, you will install WordPress, and originate your domains and email accounts. just manage your entire website. All these tools are located in the left side menu.
Another thing I love about the Bluehost dashboard is the list of disturbances right in the middle. While it’s almost useless for advanced users, it’s extremely useful for newcomers and helps keep things tidy once a website is created.
In summary, I find that each provider’s control panels are easy to use. Each scorecard was measured very easily and was well organized. However, Bluehost seems to be geared towards beginners.
Control panel comparison
Once you click on the positioning you want to manage, you will notice a menu on your left where you will manage all three environments (Production, Staging, and Development). each of them has its own menu options, such as SSL, Domains, CDN, and many more, and can be managed separately from each other.
Keep in mind that WP Engine takes care of performance, automatic updates, and security measures, so you don’t need to worry about that.
Now speaking of Bluehost, a custom cPanel is integrated into the native admin panel.
I must point out that the native dashboard is still the most managed space. cPanel is left as a host of advanced management tools such as a free file, database, and email account management.
This means that you may not even find yourself victimized as all the options like installing WordPress or other apps are located in the main admin panel. Even domain management is found in the native Bluehost admin space, under the Domains section.
Choosing a winner between the 2 here could be a terribly subjective matter. Both WP Engine and Bluehost offer the user an incredibly easy and intuitive experience that makes their services much more attractive. However, Bluehost has also integrated cPanel, which some users are also familiar with and comfortable with.
Extra hosting management features
In addition to the extraordinarily easy-to-use dashboards, both providers offer some very useful additional options.
WP Engine has applied production, staging, and development environments in its services. WP Engine’s three environments are among the top reasons people choose their services.
- Production – This is the actual live version of your website that all users move around with.
- Staging – Creates a replica of your website and is used for testing updates or debugging.
- Development: You can even create a replica of your website and it is used for creation and development.
These environments allow you to experiment, build and take a look at your website before submitting everything to the live website.
Bluehost also imposed staging practicality for WordPress sites. The creation method is extremely simple.
To create a staging atmosphere, you need to find a pre-installed Bluehost plugin in your WordPress admin section and opt for staging.
All it takes is a few clicks and you can start experimenting with your website. Well, a replica of your website, and experiment in complete safety.
Additionally, Bluehost allows you to access their promotion tools like Google Ads and Google My Business.
With these, you will be able to simply start and manage a small marketing campaign right from your dashboard. you will be able to post ads or locate your business on Google Maps for indirect queries such as “the best place to prepare dishes”.
So it looks like both providers offer staging options. And every build staging is as simple as possible. For starters, Bluehost offers a marketing tool that can help you increase site visibility.
In general, each provider area unit is very user-friendly, providing intuitive and easy-to-navigate native dashboards. However, Bluehost has cPanel in a similar way. More so, WP Engine and Bluehost provide the staging feature, with Bluehost to boot providing promotion tools.
When it comes to performance, WP Engine vs Bluehost had a winner. WP Engine is faster and more reliable than Bluehost. Its time frame was longer, the loading speed was faster, and it handled larger traffic. However, Bluehost also has undisputed smart results and faster average latency than WP Engine.
Uptime and response time
Let Pine Tree State guide you though, I prefer to evaluate these metrics. The associate degree time period between 99.9%, and 99.95% is fine. something above that is wonderful, and something below that is not so nice. The 100 percent timeframe, of course, is perfect.
Average latency of 200-450ms is good, anything over 1s is pretty dangerous, and everything in between is fine.
Both providers were examined for a similar amount: about 2 months.
At that time, WP Engine had unarguably terrifyingly spectacular results. Although it offers a 99.95% associate degree time guarantee, what you actually get is much higher. During those two months, WP Engine did not have a single outage, resulting in an excellent 100% time frame.
Its average latency was 489ms. However, I expected more. In no way does it suggest that this is a dangerous moment, however, it may be greater. particularly knowing that the average latency in the market is 600ms.
To be honest, Bluehost‘s performance is also extremely sensible. In fact, it is among several of the best-performing shared hosting providers.
In two months of testing, he had half a dozen blackouts that added up to eleven minutes of the time period. It’s still an incredible 99.99% uptime. especially when it doesn’t offer you any time guarantee in the slightest. Bluehost’s average latency of 361 ms is also very good!
In short, WP Engine showed slightly better results. The time period was reliable, standing at 100 percent. Latency was also excellent. Instead, Bluehost was just as impressive with its slightly higher average latency and still terrifyingly reliable 99.99% uptime.
To test the speed of each WP Engine and Bluehost, I ran a load speed test. I created identical circumstances – I put identical templates on both providers. Also, every area unit is hosted and tested in the US.
Good To Know
To improve performance results, you may choose to host your website on the server closest to your target market. WP Engine’s servers are located in the United States, Belgium, Germany, the United Kingdom, Taiwan, and Australia. In contrast, Bluehost has knowledge centers solely within the US.
Before we tend to list the results, let Pine Tree State hint at three measures to focus on:
- Time to Initial Computer Memory Unit (TTFB) – The time it takes for the server to react to a request to open an Internet site. Better if it is below 200 ms.
- Largest Content Paint (LCP): The time it takes to load the most important (heaviest) file on your website (image, video, etc.). It should be below 2.5s for best results.
- Full Load Time – The time it takes to load a website. to any extent beyond three seconds, and is considered a dangerous performance.
So with that in mind, WP Engine did a pretty sensible job. Your LCP is just 938ms. which simply adjusts at intervals to the norms.
The full charge time is 1.1s and it’s an amazing result. Quite a long way from the terrible three-second mark.
Now looking at the TTFB, i.e. 140ms, it is clear that WP Engine had managed to fit all of the advised timings. good loading speed and extremely responsive server. In short, good performance.
Bluehost showed slightly less spectacular results. in this case, its LCP and fully charged time area unit are 1.8 s. While it’s not quite as good as WP Engine, it’s definitely a pretty sensible result.
However, one-touch regarding here is TTFB, which is at 1 second. this means that the server may simply be a bit faster. so if it weren’t for the slow server response, positioning would possibly load faster.
In short, WP Engine showed measurably faster results. The loading time was terrifyingly fast, and also the responsiveness of the server was nice. However, also Bluehost indisputably excellent results that exceed the market average.
Stress testing results
Finally, he needed to determine how well each provider would handle the increased traffic. therefore I sent 50 virtual users to positioning for 5 minutes so that they would all move on time.
In a nutshell, 50 VU in ranking at the same time is pretty heavy traffic. If this is maintained over the months, it could have up to 50,000 monthly guests.
So I don’t expect every provider to be able to handle the traffic inherently. If that seems too much, I reduce this range by five until I succeed.
The first pass with WP Engine is at 30 VU. And that is terribly expected. The provider itself says that its most profitable configuration will support up to 25,000 monthly visitors.
It seems that he is telling the truth. What’s good to understand is that even with such high traffic, latency (blue line) remained terribly stable and didn’t overreact to increased visitors (grey line). This implies that the server is capable of handling that amount. guests as long as they don’t slow down.
In contrast, Bluehost managed 15VU.
And it seems that the latency (blue line) is much more addicted to the number of tourists (grey line).
And even though the server got a little too involved to accommodate all the guests, 15VU is still plenty. give or take fifteen thousand distinctive monthly guests.
In short, WP Engine drove bigger traffic. Their plans recommend a rough range of associate degree monthly guests, and that’s exactly what you’ll be handling. alternatively, Bluehost handled some pretty heavy traffic without fail.
All things considered, when you compare the performance of WP Engine and Bluehost, one stands out considerably. WP Engine is much faster, more reliable, and can handle larger traffic. If you get superior performance, going with WP Engine is definitely the best option.
Speaking of security, it looks like this WP Engine vs Bluehost matchup could have a clear winner. WP Engine offers a more secure platform with daily automatic backups, a proprietary firewall, and automatic threat detection, among other options. At the same time, Bluehost includes just the basics: SSL certificates and CDN integration.
WP Engine will be plenty when it comes to security. For starters, it’s all the basics: SSL certificates, one-click CDN activation, daily backups, and multi-factor authentication.
Furthermore, WP Engine adds different security measures at no additional charge.
- You get a constant watch and threat detection, so the security team is often notified if something happens and can take proactive steps to prevent any issues.
- In addition, a proprietary firewall is included, so very little to no malicious software packages will make it to the server.
- Certain plugins that can leave websites exposed to threats are also illegal.
At the same time, Bluehost offers SSL, Cloudflare CDN integration, and two-factor authentication. However, if you want to have machine-controlled backups and protection against malicious attacks with Bluehost, you will have to pay more.
- Backups with Bluehost are $2.99/month value.
- Protection against malicious attacks (SiteLock security) costs another $2.99/month.
Naturally, the superior value feature that WP Engine has offers many security measures. At the same time, Bluehost will provide security measures against the most common threats. however, you should consider along with many measures to keep your shoppers safer.
In the section, WP Engine can be a clear leader in providing terrifyingly strong security measures. Bluehost stays behind and offers additional security measures at an additional value.
Both WP Engine and Bluehost have similar support options including 24/7 live chat and phone support similar to big databases. However, WP Engine goes a step further and adds email price ticket support to the package.
I usually like to open a live chat whenever I have queries as I have actually found that it can sometimes be the quickest thank you for getting answers. therefore, that is specifically what I tested for this WP Engine vs Bluehost comparison.
I was curious to understand a little more about each provider’s money-back guarantee. And that’s specifically what I asked.
First, I contacted the WP Engine sales team and was connected in no time.
The responses were terrifyingly fast. at any point, it took only a second for the agent to respond to my message.
Although the spoken language was short, it had been pleasant. My question was answered at that time. There are no links to terms and conditions or any attempt to sell Pine Tree State as an inspiration. therefore, I must say that I used to be more than happy.
When I contacted Bluehost with the same question, I was connected in no time and the response was immediate.
The agent gave Maine a detailed summary of the terms of the money back. Once again, no links, no aggressive advertising. just a quick and easy answer that is strictly what I used to be looking for.
Although the spoken language was terribly transient, I should note that responses between messages were a bit slower than with WP Engine. However, not by much, therefore there is nothing to worry about there.
In addition to the possibility of live chat, both providers have excellent information bases where you can find many useful articles on different topics of interest.
First, the WP Engine support center is incredibly well organized. These are totally different topics from the main (most viewed) articles indicated. If you want, you can also use a query bar to search for specific tutorials and explanations on web hosting or website management.
Bluehost’s mental object is just as organized as WP Engine’s. It’s a very clean look, you can select a topic of interest or search for a particular question.
Both vendors have many useful and up-to-date articles in their databases. However, I have to say that I prefer the look of WP Engine better. However, that doesn’t make Bluehost any less useful or practical.
All in all, WP Engine and Bluehost’s area unit are awfully similar in terms of live chat. each of his agents was quick to respond and truly impressively skilled. However, you will be able to get email customer support from WP Engine, something that is not a possibility once you engage Bluehost. Furthermore, both providers have incredibly spectacular and up-to-date databases.
As with all things, when it comes to WP Engine vs Bluehost, each has its own pros and cons. WP Engine offers you superior performance and development in three environments. On the other hand, Bluehost could be a less expensive option that also gives you good performance for the price.
|Price||★★★☆☆||★★★★☆||Bluehost is much cheaper, with costs starting at $2.95/month, compared to WP Engine’s $22.50/month.|
|Ease of use||★★★★☆||★★★★★||Both providers use a native hosting admin panel, however, Bluehost has integrated cPanel in a similar way. Regardless, each area unit is awfully easy to use with more tools included.|
|Performance||★★★★★||★★★★☆||WP Engine was faster, more reliable, and handled larger traffic. Their timeframe was 100%, compared to Bluehost’s 99.99%. However, Bluehost had a higher average interval: 361 ms compared to 489 ms for WP Engine.|
|Security||★★★★★||★★★★☆||Both providers adopt SSL certificates and DDoS protection. However, WP Engine bundles a proprietary firewall and automatic daily backups.|
|Support||★★★★☆||★★★★☆||Both providers have 24/7 phone and live chat support, with WP Engine additionally providing a ticketing system. Both providers have very knowledgeable and prompt agents.|
So for the price, Bluehost packs in a ton to offer while maintaining budget-friendly performance. is another distinct advantage over WP Engine – it’s often used with any CMS you like. so if you want to run a private journal or small business website, consider Bluehost.
Alternatively, the performance is much faster and the website development perspective area unit is more advanced with WP Engine. So, if you’re looking for good performance, security, and an extra business-oriented approach to hosting, WP Engine may just be the answer.
If neither WP Engine nor Bluehost sounds like a decent option for you, there are different hosting providers you can consider. Probably the cheapest valuation options out there are often found with Hostinger, while the regulator offers a strong cloud-based alternative to WP Engine.
Hostinger is one of the most profitable providers out there. Their shared hosting plans area unit is very low cost, with costs starting at as little as $2.59/month.
It is both terrifyingly simple to use and offers fast services, making it a very standard choice among beginners and advanced users on tight budgets.
Flywheel is at the opposite end of the rating spectrum, with its rating being the same as WP Engine. the most cost-effective Flywheel managed to host setup costs $13.00/month.
It offers a complicated and powerful cloud-based WordPress hosting possibility if that is what you are looking for. it’s terribly simple to use, and you can expect excellent performance.
Thanks for visiting our Website. If you appreciate our work, kindly show us some support in our comments section 🙂
Did you have some experience in any of these hosting companies? If so, please leave a review, positive or negative, below.
To read more similar articles click here